Miss Rutherford - 9 COM 2017 is a social tool that democratizes the decision-making process through online debate. Join Now!
- Find a debate you care about.
- Read arguments and vote the best up and the worst down.
- Earn points and become a thought leader!
To learn more, check out the FAQ or Tour.
Be Yourself
Your profile reflects your reputation, it will build itself as you create new debates, write arguments and form new relationships.
Make it even more personal by adding your own picture and updating your basics.
Charlotte_km
| Reward Points: | 2 |
| Efficiency:
Efficiency is a measure of the effectiveness of your arguments. It is the number of up votes divided by the total number of votes you have (percentage of votes that are positive). Choose your words carefully so your efficiency score will remain high. | 100% |
| Arguments: | 2 |
| Debates: | 0 |
Joined:
Having a mandatory jury system is important in creating diversity that represents the community. For example, instead of having just middle aged white men deciding the decision. Having a wide variety of people of all ages, sexes, jobs types, personal background experiences etc can help have a more fair and just explanation.
The jury system should not be mandatory for several reasons; the first being the amount of Tax payer money that is wasted, this can go to other improvements in society. A lot of the more severe cases that include murders and complex forensic evidence, would need more experienced citizens that can come to a fairer conclusion for both sides. Another reason is that many full time workers may not have the spare time whether it be family reasons, financial flexibility or other outside commitments.
I also found out in America there have been some cases where the case drags on for a longer period of time, people have lost their jobs.
About Me
|
I am probably a good person but I haven't taken the time to fill out my profile, so you'll never know! |
Want an easy way to create new debates about cool web pages? Click Here
